by Thomas J. Belknap Progressive Messaging and Anger pt I

A day late and a dollar short, that’s me. . .

I’ve only just gotten to this lively debate on RT after the weekend, so I wasn’t able to contribute.  So, in lieu of genuine debate, I’ll switch to shadow boxing. . .

rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate

That?s what progressives who want to make a difference need to do. Of course, I?m not talking about hitting anyone. I?m talking about coming up with tough questions that surprise people like Kuhl and Walsh, I?m talking about staging spur-of-the moment protests about issues other than Iraq (like stem cells), and I?m talking about filming all of this and putting it on YouTube (which people have gotten pretty good about). That?s winning politics, and despite the violent imagery I brought up, it?s also respectful politics. Kuhl and Walsh deserve to be put on the hot seat with difficult questions; I?m sure they agree that is part of their job description. They don?t deserve to be treated like war criminals ? Dick Cheney does, they don?t.

OK, read (or reread, as the case may be) the above blog and comments on your own, it’s a good one.  The main points, from my point of view are:

  1. Are MoveOn.org campaigns becoming predictably angry and playing into the hands of Republicans?
  2. How do Progressives “Fight smarter” against the Republican Noise Machine?

On the first issue, I wonder less whether or not MoveOn.org is playing *into the hands of Republicans* and more about whether they’re playing *out of the hands* of Dems and like-minded individuals.  They’re constantly shrilling about something, but what and where?

The “what” starts to get hard to figure out after a point.  The “where” is my freakin’ email inbox.  Several times a week.  Over and over again.  One just popped up on my inbox whilst I typed this entry, no shit.  I’m sure Nita Chaudhary is a nice girl, but she’s not speaking to me, just using my inbox like so much cheap wine.  I don’t want your freakin’ bumper sticker.  No means no, you swine.  I’m starting to feel all dirty.

Where else have I heard of MoveOn.org doing anything?  Nowhere.  Maybe I’m just not paying attention, but if you can’t grab the attention of those who aren’t hanging on your every word, who gives a shit?

Let me be clear, I’m not cynical.  OK, so I’m cynical, but that doesn’t mean I’m not paying attention to politics.  I read the D&C; I read CNN (god help me); I read RT, TAP and a host of other local, state and national political blogs, obviously.  But I don’t have a freakin’ clue what MoveOn is doing, and I really don’t care anymore.  I’ve long-since stopped reading their emails, I’m just too lazy to unsubscribe and a kind of “morbid fascination with lame” keeps me interested in an odd way.

And if that’s my opinion, what could the opinions be of the Senators’ and Representatives’ staff who handle all the skeins of email and letters those people get in a day?  If you said “straight in the shit-can,” I’ll betcha dollars to doughnuts you’re right.  Because ultimately, all they really represent is the same Liberal/Progressive position they always do. 

I’m not saying that the Progressive voting bloc isn’t important to a lot of Senators, but rather that I doubt MoveOn’s efforts are really swaying the conversation one way or another that public opinion polls couldn’t have done.  They’re not saying anything new.

I’ll get to the second question and my own lame answer in another post. . .

Technorati Tags: , , ,

powered by performancing firefox

5 Responses to “Progressive Messaging and Anger pt I”

  1. March 12th, 2007 | 12:13 pm

    I don’t get MoveOn email (luckily) but I agree with your point that their repetition and shrillness leads people to ignore them.

  2. March 12th, 2007 | 12:53 pm

    Another point which I didn’t not get a chance to iterate in the post was the fact that MoveOn’s confrontational nature is so bad that they’re not even getting the message right. They’ve just run off the goddamned end of the Earth with it. Just look at the Obey outburst. Completely uninformed people acting like they’re going to single-handedly stop the war because they’ve watched Fahrenheit 9-11 too many times.

  3. March 12th, 2007 | 2:09 pm

    That Obey exchange raises another point - the notion that activists are unsatisfiable. Obey is one of the most progressive-friendly MOC’s, he voted against the Iraq war, etc., but organizations are still staging sit-ins in his offices and being arrested because they won’t leave. The message is that whatever Obey does, it’s not enough.

  4. March 12th, 2007 | 2:35 pm

    Yep. I commented more in depth on that subject in the Part II of this “series” (which is not my best writing, but what the hell?). I think you made a shrewd observation also about MoveOn members basically throwing their hard work out the window by sending letters via MoveOn. MoveOn needs to maintain it’s legitimacy by showing numbers. Unfortunately, they’re dragging down the Progressive movement in the process.

  5. March 13th, 2007 | 11:23 am

    [...] should fight smarter.  DragonFlyEye has also picked up on the debate (in two posts — here and [...]

Leave a reply

Please note: Due to administrative constraints, approved comments can take up to fifteen minutes to appear here. Moderated comments will be reviewed and if accepted, posted as soon as an administrator can do so. Please review our User Content Policy for more information.

  • Rochester radio landscape now without Bud Lowell

    [caption id="attachment_51" align="alignright" width="200" caption="Bud Lowell at the controls"]Bud Lowell at the controls[/caption] Bud Lowell's last WXXI radio piece has the same qualities that I've always looked forward to hearing from him. The seven minute piece about Hickey Freeman skillfully integrates ambient audio, the voices of people not frequently heard on corporate radio and Bud's narration. Like so many of Bud's pieces the story doesn't just inform. The listener is left feeling richer . . . More. . .   ||    Get the Feed
DragonFlyEye.Net is now mobile! Try it today from your mobile phone!