When you’re trying to make the media and the voters swallow a completely incomprehensible explanation for your campaign’s alleged activities, does it help or hurt your cause to introduce another apologist who makes even less sense and introduces new absurd claims? I’m not sure, but I’m guessing the Clinton Camp thinks it does. And Stephanie Tubbs Jones seems to think that Barack is, in fact, Somali:
Palin to Face Troopergate Findings Despite Attempt to Shut it Down || DFE News Roundup
Central Banks Coordinate Rate Drop, Markets Fluctuate || MSN Market Dispatches
Candidates State Thier Positions in Town Hall Debate || CNN.com
Fed to Assume Control of Short Term Debt Market || AP News
Bank of America\'s profit\'s plumet 68% || CNN Money