When you’re trying to make the media and the voters swallow a completely incomprehensible explanation for your campaign’s alleged activities, does it help or hurt your cause to introduce another apologist who makes even less sense and introduces new absurd claims? I’m not sure, but I’m guessing the Clinton Camp thinks it does. And Stephanie Tubbs Jones seems to think that Barack is, in fact, Somali:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnLSkWulPVE[/youtube]
