In the American Colonies, before the Revolution, taxation was done at the whim of a Parliament in which American tax payers had no representation whatsoever. But far worse for many Americans caught a-foul of the law, settling disputes and penalties with the British legal system often meant showing up in court in Merry Old England herself. Such a voyage in those days meant months and years away from the very properties these Americans we trying to maintain, to say nothing of the lost income and extra expense of the voyage, lodging in England and the like. It was precisely these types of extreme hardships – much more so than the taxation itself – that prompted a few well-educated and wealthy Americans to start plotting the Revolution.
The American Revolution can therefore be thought of in a certain context as a radical renegotiation of the relationship between the ruler and the ruled. Not simply a reinvention of government, but forging of a new principle of power sharing, supported by thousands of legal pleadings in British courts, up to and including the final and most famous Declaration of Independence.
But I don’t recall having reached any such deal with cameras or computers.[1. Title of this post provided by a lyric from Yes: Machine Messiah]
More and more municipal governments, including most recently Rochester, have been employing red light cameras and other automated means of handling law enforcement issues. This is raising many legal and ethical concerns among many quarters, as Doug Emblidge points to in his above-linked blog post. My concern may seem oblique, but it seems to me that implicit in the negotiation of law is the fact that law exists as a guidepost towards justice, not an iron-clad set of parameters from within which a computer program is expected to perform.
This is not an abstract concept for philosophy classes, nor is it a plot for some 1970’s “computers take over the world” scenario movie. No set of circumstances which deviates from the law yields any other outcome for a computer than a violation of that law, and even if the issue can be resolved in a court, we once again require that potentially innocent people take time out of their lives to prove thier innocence – or potentially fail to – at the behest of a set of arbitrary laws.
Cops do not issue tickets for every violation they see. They don’t even issue tickets for every person they pull over. Computers contain no subroutines for compassion or clemency.
And hey! Here’s at least one bit of good news for Rochesterians where crime is concerned: you don’t need to be as worried about identity theft as you would in Las Vegas! That’s right, BlogWonks.com compiled two lists from Sperlings Best Places, one of places where identity theft is high, and one where it is exceptionally low. Guess which list Rochester’s on? If you said the low one, you’ve been reading this post very carefully.
Yes, that’s right. The one thing you don’t need to worry about as a Rochesterian is someone coming along and pretending to be you. Venereal disease? Murder? Theft? Be very, very afraid. But identity theft is right out.
Oh, boy. Just what we need in Rochester: one of the Big Three getting sued. Bausch and Lomb’s ReNu Moisture Lock contact lens solution has apparently been alleged to be responsible for 26 cases of a rare fungal eye infection. What is worse is that it’s a rare infection, and from the way the article makes it sound, there is little chance that the execs didn’t know about it:
Bausch suspends lens solution, faces lawsuit – Yahoo! News
The company was sued in federal court in New York for allegedly failing to disclose problems with ReNu after it became aware that users in Asia had contracted fungal infections.
Bausch & Lomb suspended sales of ReNu in Hong Kong and Singapore after potential health problems arose in Asia two months ago.
What is truly weird about the whole thing is that out of 109 cases in the US, only 26 seem to be directly linked to the contact solution. That begs the question: how many cases of this infection happen anually under normal circumstances?
Continue reading Big Trouble for B&L
This news isn’t going to make very many people very happy at all:
U.S. to Contract Foreign Co. to Scan Cargo – Yahoo! News
One of Americans’ favorite beach destinations, the Bahamas, is getting a new U.S. arrival ? sophisticated equipment to detect radioactive materials in shipping cargo. But U.S. customs agents won’t be on site to supervise the machine’s use as a nuclear safeguard for the American shoreline that is just 65 miles away from Freeport. Under an unusual arrangement, a Hong Kong company will help operate the detector.
But at what point are we becoming isolationist and even naive about the ways of the world? There are so many ways of looking at this issue. . .
Continue reading Teetering on the Edge of Isolationism / Nonrepudiable Security Technology
Thank goodness that at least eBay responds quicker and with a bit more grace than does PayPal. I sent off my email to the [email protected] address, and within an hour, received my reply. The reply was a very gracious message of appreciation for alerting them to the problem, along with some tips on avoiding such predators. Now, this new phishing site appears to be relatively new: one security site only seems to have acknowledged this particular bugger as recently as this week; however, there does seem to be an enormous amount of phishing aimed at PayPal customers.
Continue reading Phish On! All’s Well That Ends Well