Categories
Uncategorized

Dean Baker on Effective Financial Regulation

In his post, ironic-twistingly named “A Financial Sector Small Enough to Drown in a Bathtub,” Dean Baker provides some simple and practical solutions for regulating the overgrown mess of a financial system we currently have:

The best way to restrict the size of the financial industry is through a system of modest financial transactions taxes (FTT). A tax of 0.25 percent on a stock trade, or 0.02 percent tax on the purchase of an option or future, will have almost no impact on those looking to invest in the stock market or hedge their wheat crop. However, it will impose a heavy cost on short-term traders, and therefore will substantially reduce the volume of trading.

Basically, we got into our Subprime/ARM Mortgage crisis because the people lending us money took our debts and sold them as commodities on the market. Doing so meant conducting hundreds and even thousands of individual transactions, all of which would be eligible for this tax he proposes. As he explains, such a tax would have no effect on small businesses or private individuals looking to get a piece of the “American Dream,” but would have made huge differences to the type of financial two-step that got us where we are right now.

Baker also goes on to point out that lots of other perfectly industrious and wealthy nations have imposed the exact same tax. He specifically cites the UK. What he does not point out is that there is a very specific reason that the UK might want to impose such a tax: they’ve already been through basically the same process we’re about to go through now after WWI and it basically killed their empire.

The Dutch also went through a similar scenario. So did Spain, after a fashion. Even Rome did it. In fact it seems an endemic European failing that whenever it seems obvious that manufacturing will not continue to provide limitless growth, we choose to try to make money in the financial sector rather than accept the modesty of an empire at it’s peak. But making money off the financial sector is basically making money out of air; it’s a Robbing Peter to Pay Paul scam which, once the momentum of that game is interrupted, cannot help but come crashing down on itself.

So, that’s where we’re headed. It won’t mean the end of our nation, but it will mean some bitter disappointment for the next few years, I’m afraid. With luck, it will also mean a bit of enlightenment for our head-long society once the power players in it begin to understand that a small shift in fate could put them on the bottom with all that chattel they’ve been ignoring.

Categories
Uncategorized

Countrywide: K-Mart Mortgages Regulated by Walmart Regulators

Via Dean Baker, as reported by the Washington Post:

When Countrywide Financial felt pressured by federal agencies charged with overseeing it, executives at the giant mortgage lender simply switched regulators in the spring of 2007.

The benefits were clear: Countrywide’s new regulator, the Office of Thrift Supervision, promised more flexible oversight of issues related to the bank’s mortgage lending. For OTS, which depends on fees paid by banks it regulates and competes with other regulators to land the largest financial firms, Countrywide was a lucrative catch.

But OTS was not an effective regulator. This year, the government has seized three of the largest institutions regulated by OTS, including IndyMac Bancorp, Washington Mutual — the largest bank in U.S. history to go bust — and on Friday evening, Downey Savings and Loan Association. The total assets of the OTS thrifts to fail this year: $355.7 billion. Three others were forced to sell to avoid failure, including Countrywide.

Hmm. . I’m thinking this is a clue to the problem. Did you happen to notice that the regulatory agency is dependent on fees paid to it by the companies it regulates? In other words, companies that it regulates that don’t make money are of no value to them, because they can’t pay for the regulation. That’s a strong incentive to keep companies profitable in George Bush’s administration, I am thinking.

I’m all for companies paying their way: they have to pay to dispose of their waste, they have to pay to get ISO certification, I would probably be OK with them having to pay for their regulatory duties as well. Still, the monies paid them aught not to factor into their budget, but rather be rolled into the general funds of the government. Or given away to starving children in Africa. But tying a regulatory body to the fortunes of the regulated is as clear a conflict of interest as one could imagine.

Categories
Uncategorized

Dean Baker Sez: Calm Down

Dean Baker, writing for American Prospect, points out that Wall Street is hardly the only part of the economy that matters.  A huge drop in a single day is a scary event, but it’s not necessarily the sign of the apocalypse.

Categories
Uncategorized

The Blowback Keeps Blowing Back

Apparently, those responsible journalists left in the national media have had enough.  Dean Baker reprints the open letter to ABC News demanding more serious debates in the future than the travesty of Wednesday night.

Categories
Uncategorized

Damn Straight, Mr. Baker.

Dean Baker at the American Prospect weighs in on the prospect of a bailout of the fools who got us into this current economic crisis.  Rich yacht owners do not need to be bailed out, they need to be allowed to suffer their own consequences.

Put it another way: all these rich Republican types and financial bankers have spent a lot of money on lobbyists to keep the government “off their backs.”  They’ve done a whole lot of work to keep the government regulations to a minimum.  They wanted to be free of the government.  Well, boys, bon appetito!